Forums

Stories Forum Hall of FameThread is locked

Quick find code: 49-50-985-63538857

of 37
Borna Coric

Borna Coric

Posts: 3,785Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Curiously enough, why are the judges arranged in a rank format, Coz? Was it just to distinguish between each name?

In the original thread, the names were arranged over many pages with their winning entries immediately following, correct? I do think the list of names is more helpful. As to how to order it, I think it must be chronologically so.

13-Jul-2012 02:31:36

Cozmic
Mar
fmod Member
2018

Cozmic

Forum Moderator Posts: 16,435Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
"Curiously enough, why are the judges arranged in a rank format, Coz? Was it just to distinguish between each name?"

So that it would match the format of the author list.

13-Jul-2012 03:09:39

Yrolg

Yrolg

Posts: 25,296Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Thank you for removing the rankings, Cozmic. I was not aware there was such overwhelming support for the motion. I think chronological order by contest start date is the best bet. Poller5 made very prudent observations and I agree with most of what he said. This is a commemoration of the past, not a gloating grounds. It is nice to look through the names and remember the entries and people. It is unnecessary to use it as an excuse to claim superiority.

I also second his thanks to you, Cozmic, for your dedication in curating the thread after Mod Craddock left. Thank you.

--Yrolg

13-Jul-2012 04:55:58

Quick find code: 49-50-985-63538857Back to Top