Curiously enough, why are the judges arranged in a rank format, Coz? Was it just to distinguish between each name?
In the original thread, the names were arranged over many pages with their winning entries immediately following, correct? I do think the list of names is more helpful. As to how to order it, I think it must be chronologically so.
Thank you for removing the rankings, Cozmic. I was not aware there was such overwhelming support for the motion. I think chronological order by contest start date is the best bet. Poller5 made very prudent observations and I agree with most of what he said. This is a commemoration of the past, not a gloating grounds. It is nice to look through the names and remember the entries and people. It is unnecessary to use it as an excuse to claim superiority.
I also second his thanks to you, Cozmic, for your dedication in curating the thread after Mod Craddock left. Thank you.