Gleytharsaid: My point is simply that if we are allowed 5 of these, then you shouldn't also be allowed to have 5 traps elsewhere because that undermines the whole concept of a trap limit. When people do other parts of hunter, they do it for a short period. If we have to remove the nest to do so, it would not be a problem.Stop being a entitled snowflake. If you want something in game, earn it rather than demand it be given to you.
The bird nest on fossil island. That's his complain. You can have all 4 of them going and then do 5 traps elsewhere. It would not do much to take those 4 (5 if this happens) down to do the other traps. When people do hunter off the island, they seldom do it for more than an hour or three at a time.
That would be at most 3 runs lost.
If you are doing imps boxes, as an example, near ardounge imp field, using either coal or iron as your banking item, you can usually get 150 to 250 per hour, at 450 a pop. That's around 70-115k per hour. So in 3 hours you should get 210-345k possibly more. From the bird nest you would get only get 13680 in that time, so its a decent compromise.Stop being a entitled snowflake. If you want something in game, earn it rather than demand it be given to you.
- Last edited on 27-Sep-2019 00:17:01 by cooke fletch
weston btwsaid: Kegssaid: weston btwsaid: This would devalue wilderness hunter lol. I never mentioned that, but what would?
Extra traps should only be allowed inside of the wilderness. That's part of the draw to bring players there. If you wanna incentivize something with extra traps in particular, make it risky. Otherwise, find something else to get my support. I have nothing against buffing this particular piece of content, so I'm sure we could find something.In the wilderness you get an extra trap. At 80, you have 6 traps in the wild. How does having 5 bird nest change that?Stop being a entitled snowflake. If you want something in game, earn it rather than demand it be given to you.