Forums

Negative xp lamps

Quick find code: 322-323-891-66115093

of 3
cooke fletch

cooke fletch

Posts: 2,590Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
polled and failed.

Since its something pkers want, it will likely be called an integrity issue and be added to the game, making pures the primary build in the game. Stop being a entitled snowflake. If you want something in game, earn it rather than demand it be given to you.

08-Aug-2019 04:03:15

VasaTekVesp

VasaTekVesp

Posts: 615Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
cooke fletch said:
polled and failed.

Since its something pkers want, it will likely be called an integrity issue and be added to the game, making pures the primary build in the game.

Why are you against it though? I don't PK, but I'd support it just for the money sink. Quit bitching about the problems you created by spite voting.

08-Aug-2019 04:12:51

cooke fletch

cooke fletch

Posts: 2,590Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Because there is suppose to be a balance between every build. A negative lamp would unbalance all the builds with the pure being the king. Stop being a entitled snowflake. If you want something in game, earn it rather than demand it be given to you.

08-Aug-2019 05:00:56

VasaTekVesp

VasaTekVesp

Posts: 615Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
cooke fletch said:
Because there is suppose to be a balance between every build. A negative lamp would unbalance all the builds with the pure being the king.

Gotcha, I'd still disagree since pures would still be heavily limited DPS-wise and such but I now understand your point. You think it'd be OP. Quit bitching about the problems you created by spite voting.

08-Aug-2019 06:42:05

Notcool97

Notcool97

Posts: 1,469Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I'm against it because it doesn't address the real issue: the fact that gaining 1 defence level can make your account seem useless in PvP. Instead of catering to people that take advantage of a broken system, they should try and fix the system so people can PvP effectively without creating alts and restricting the skills they level up.

08-Aug-2019 11:24:44 - Last edited on 08-Aug-2019 11:25:19 by Notcool97

VasaTekVesp

VasaTekVesp

Posts: 615Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Notcool97 said:
I'm against it because it doesn't address the real issue: the fact that gaining 1 defence level can make your account seem useless in PvP. Instead of catering to people that take advantage of a broken system, they should try and fix the system so people can PvP effectively without creating alts and restricting the skills they level up.

Tbh idgaf about that. Just toss a 46 defense requirement on Raids. It's disgusting and repulsive having to see these PvP builds attempting to raid. They're useless leeches and burdens even worse than ironmen. They never train any other skill and can't even make Xeric's Aids lmao. Quit bitching about the problems you created by spite voting.

08-Aug-2019 16:31:57

Kakarot l

Kakarot l

Posts: 47Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Well, i don't think you already know they announced they will repoll it.

This has been posted on july 11, 2019.

"One suggestion we've had had been to add negative XP reward lamps as an LMS reward. Since they were last polled, there has been continued demand for and discussion around the topic. These would allow players to remove a small amount of experience (~500xp) from a combat stat below level 50. Doing so means players could 'fix' their accounts by removing unwanted experience."

Note: It is going to be a one time deal, this lamp can only used once. So no great effects in "big changes of builds" Just a small xp removal.

I'm asking, is there any plan soon to repoll this? i haven't heard or seen anything about it since this announcement.

09-Aug-2019 01:23:59

Quick find code: 322-323-891-66115093Back to Top